http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jht...
Answers:
That is absolutely ludicrous. As a single parent whose child has no contact or support from her "father", (his decision, not mine) I fail to understand the logic in that. He is obviously involved in his child's life and if he has the kids a couple of days a week, that eases some of the financial burden, so what's the problem? The mother doesn't realise she's born, silly bit ch.
Oh, just read the rest, she's not a silly bit ch, I apologise.
well woman run things so it doesnt suprise me, all laws are squewed towards women.
Having shared contact has nothing to do with support. Nor does visitation rights!
They are mutually excusive!
GOOD!
I have 2 kids with my missus and I have them for 2 nites a week. The CSA have arranged that the payments I make take these 2 nites into consideration and the amount is reduced accordingly.
If this "lawyer" was good at his job, he would understand that blokes like me get really p*ssed off that other dads find excuses not to pay, so good for the CSA taking a stand for once.
Outrageous - but then, the law always was an ***!
The 'offensive' word Yahoo has chosen to delete is a*ss.
In New Zealand, shared contact is just that, shared, if the guy has to fork out for the child, then so does the mother, it's only in cases where the mother has sole custody that the father gets into trouble for not paying maintenance, if he doesn't pay. It's a real hard one though, because the fathers are often the ones that don't get to 'call the shots' after a relationship break up.
That is just so stupid. I divorced years ago, but the difference with me and the man mentioned in the report is that I got `Joint Custody` of the kids. In this mans case he didn't have any court ruling that he was in fact looking after the kids half of the time.
Being a lawyer he should have known this, but still, this kind of sentencing stinks of the ridiculous.
Good. He should pay.
More needs to be done about the fathers, and mothers, who don't take their share of financial responsibility for their children.
all men should pay maintenance but going to prison is not going to help anyone why cant they take it out of his wages or the social money what good is going to prison
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment