stuart harling has been found guilty of murdering nurse cheryl moss just for the sake of it,he has fantasys of rape,gunning people down at a school he was bullied at,and how much to the tax payers is his imprisonmeant going to cost,why dont we just string him up and save the uk money,and before you wolly pc lotstart bleating cheryl moss was a nurse helping the sick ,and being a decent member of society,he was just pure evil the poor girl never even got to scream,as he stabbed and stabbed her,he stopped only when his witches mask fell off
society must be protected against people like this evil little monster
he should never be allowed out again,if we cant hang him
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20070628/t...
Answers:
You have to have taken a life before you can ask a question like that.
Hanging might be an answer, I shan't insult you by asking if you have ever taken a life.
It leaves you saddened, elated and ashamed, severe depression follows.
Sometimes you wish for your own death to hurry so you can apologise and atone.
You want someone to go through that as an executioner?.
If you are so willing for executions, go to a country that still carries them out and offer your services.
Life in a Mental Hospital, without liberal meddling psychiatrists would be an answer too.
We shouldn't hang him, he has a mental illness. Asperger's syndrome means he doesn't know the difference between right and wrong.
He needs to be detained in an asylum forever, however. For everyone's safety.
if you want to bring back the Death Penalty,
i'm in compete agreement with you.
BUT
%26 this is the awkward bit, killing people is against their Human Rights regardless of their crimes, so unless we back away from these human-rights EU rules, we have no hope of ever bringing it back.
i think paying to keep these low-lifes in the lap of luxury, room/board, fed %26 pandered too,
is a huge waste of public funds.
hang them %26 put them out of their misery.
Why don't we string him up?
Why don't YOU string him up you armchair reporter.
If you've never taken a life, then the urine would be running down your leg [as indeed it does from your mouth!] you wouldn't have the guts to put the rope around his neck and pull the release unless you could do it from your living room seat!
Don't you just luv it, "society must be protected" but please don't ask me to do it, I'm just an armchair terrorist !
Contrary to a previous ill informed posting, Harling hasn't got a mental illness. Asperger's is a form of autism, a learning difficulty.
Labelling everyone who is evil or wicked as mentally ill does little to help those with genuine problems, and helps perpetuate the myth they are all homicidal maniacs.
I agree that he should never be released.
Well I bet a lot of people secretly fantasise about expressing power over other people so don't read too much into that.. I mean you seem to be fantasizing about taking this Stuart's life for a start.
As for killing him as some sort of avengement for that murder victim's life.. well its not going to bring the Nurse back to life and is unlikely to act as a deterrent next time someone unstable loses their grip on reality either. Keeping him in secure supervised accommodation seems like the most humane thing for society to do. He could be forced to participate in treatment and experimental treatment programs. That might be useful.
well he does deserve to go to prision.. but if the schools would moniter the bullying that was going on and protect our children form it.. then it may stop some of the insanity.. i am not saying that is a excuse for what he did .. it is not but if you have never been bully before and the teachers turn there back and protect the bully instead of you then you dont know what it feels like
Goodness me Archie, you are cross!
Of all the arguments for the reinstatement of capital punishment, the financial argument you put forward is the weakest of all. To reduce a complex moral issue to "I don't want my taxes spent keeping him alive", is facile to say the least.
This man is obviously severely mentally ill, but in a sense, that's not important. He should remain in a high security institution while there is any chance he could be a danger to the public, and I suspect that means for the rest of his life.
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
More On Gaddel?
Has anyone contacted the State attorney generals office. Or the State of New Jersey who they have some type of contract to get their tax foreclosures?
Answers:
I don't understand you people. I have been following the Gaddel info on here for a few weeks now.
If your not happy or squeamish, then ask for your money back. They can and will give it back to you. I have seen this first hand. Doesn't that make more sense then posting on an internet BB.
If you guys continue to be a pain in the a** then everyone is going to lose. There won't be room for any new investors, b/c the company won't be taking any more. They will just do all of the deals themselves.
A good friend of mine just settled for $20,000 and got the money. I am due to close any day now myself.
And for those of you who keep calling this Ponzi, I brought zero people in. So much for the Ponzi theory.
Quel bizarre.
The Gaddel website says:
To Our Valued Members and Potential Members
It has come to our attention that various websites have erroneous information posted about our organization. Our corporate attorneys are in the process of addressing information that has been posted on these sites. We identified the person(s) that made these false and erroneous statements and we are taking the necessary action against these individuals and/or persons. Our corporate attorneys have advised us to contact these websites so as to report this misconduct and abuse. We will file any and all necessary complaints that will assist in removing this information. We have representatives available to answer any inquires as to the validity of our organization. Please feel free to utilize the “Contact Us” link if you have any further questions.
Currently our website is under construction and we appreciate your patience.
Hoo, boy, whatever scam y'all were trying to pull has just gone poof. I would not want to be one of the instigators of the runmors etc.
Answers:
I don't understand you people. I have been following the Gaddel info on here for a few weeks now.
If your not happy or squeamish, then ask for your money back. They can and will give it back to you. I have seen this first hand. Doesn't that make more sense then posting on an internet BB.
If you guys continue to be a pain in the a** then everyone is going to lose. There won't be room for any new investors, b/c the company won't be taking any more. They will just do all of the deals themselves.
A good friend of mine just settled for $20,000 and got the money. I am due to close any day now myself.
And for those of you who keep calling this Ponzi, I brought zero people in. So much for the Ponzi theory.
Quel bizarre.
The Gaddel website says:
To Our Valued Members and Potential Members
It has come to our attention that various websites have erroneous information posted about our organization. Our corporate attorneys are in the process of addressing information that has been posted on these sites. We identified the person(s) that made these false and erroneous statements and we are taking the necessary action against these individuals and/or persons. Our corporate attorneys have advised us to contact these websites so as to report this misconduct and abuse. We will file any and all necessary complaints that will assist in removing this information. We have representatives available to answer any inquires as to the validity of our organization. Please feel free to utilize the “Contact Us” link if you have any further questions.
Currently our website is under construction and we appreciate your patience.
Hoo, boy, whatever scam y'all were trying to pull has just gone poof. I would not want to be one of the instigators of the runmors etc.
Moral Standing of America?
A critical issue against America made by extremists Islam is that of it's overall moral standing. Should this be a concern addressed by 2008 Presidential hopefuls? Should they seek to create a better impression to the rest of the world, particularly rising fundamentalism? Should they seek to stand the country's position to remain civilized, while seemingly shifting from being agnostic to actually removing religion from society, or should they be more proactive in pursuing and wiping out fundamentalism, even if it involves funding wars in foreign countries?
Answers:
Creating a more positive impression is a useless effort for any Presidential hopeful. That is the job of the public. How can he/she create a better impression when the media (seen world wide) shows nothing but the worst in us.
It seems to me that we need to point out that terrorism is flat out wrong. That this sort of behavior is not acceptable no matter where you may live, for any reason and the people of other countries will not stand for it. Killing innocent men, women, and children to create fear to get you way is not the better way of life. How is it possible that these individuals can see it this way. Gangs on the streets of major cites use a similar tactic while fighting among themselves. To me they are just a step away from being domestic terrorists. But even they can see that it is wrong to kill women and children caught in the middle.
The change, if there is to be one, must be at home. We must teach our children to value life, respect social norms, get back to doing what is right and stop just thinking about ourselves for a change. Maybe we need someone who will encourage this type of change.
Its not a quick fix, but nothing ever worth anything ever is.
Islamic fundamentalists tolerate nothing, and no one. Whatever we do, short of converting, will not satisfy them. Anything else -- they want to kill us.
Wow, great question.
It can simply be wrapped up as an issue of freedom. We allow women to wear halter-tops. In many Islamic country's, that is immoral. They practice terrorism, we do not. On the other hand, we do have a culture focused on loveless sex and violence in the media. Is that moral? Not necessarily, but more importantly than morality is freedom, for without freedom to be immoral, there is no moral fiber.
Moral highground is lost to us. We have too many high up that believe waterboarding is a good idea. We own and operate Gitmo and secret prisons around the world. We are the human rights abusers. Becoming completely secular would help. Especially getting rid of the Crusader type rhetoric that goes around some. The Crusades were a vile and disgusting time in history and the ones that remember best are the islamic fundamentalists. We need to purge from our society people that believe things like the world is 5,000 yrs old, dinosaurs and humans were alive at the same time.
It is my theory that each of us are born with the ability to understand the parameters of morality. Religious philosophical structures have been established,and are utilized by the leaders of these religions for the purpose of defining moral and social behavior approved by the religious tenets of the religion.
Guilt is the tool utilized by every religion to manipulate their congregations. Guilt is created when any of us commit actions which we know are unacceptable or immoral. Rationalization, denial, projection, and ignorance are the primary excuses people use to try to excuse their immoral behavior. Hypocrisy is alive, well, and practiced by most of the members of every religion, from the leadership down to the congregation.
What has happened is we've rewarded people for behaving selfishly and interpreting laws to benefit themselves. This behavior encourages others to follow and now we've become an I/me nation instead of the we/us nation we used to be.
The moral standing of America is not something that can be addressed on the governmental circuit, because our morals are influenced more by our media. When the government has tried to step in, America cried out "Freedom of speech!" and "Freedom of expression!" without realizing that when the constitution was founded, there was the unwritten clause of responsibility. We have our freedoms as long as they are used responsibly.
A critical failure of criticism of America are people who believe everything from Hollywood is a true reflection of American society, then criticise that picture.
Every community has all kinds of churches, mosques, synagogs, etc. with heavy attendance on holy days. Alcohol may not be sold on Sundays. Most of the population believes in some holy book, or respects its teachings.
While western advertising loves to show unclothed women, walk down any street in America, and you can see that men and women are clothed appropriately.
You can't tell that from TV and the Movies.
Answers:
Creating a more positive impression is a useless effort for any Presidential hopeful. That is the job of the public. How can he/she create a better impression when the media (seen world wide) shows nothing but the worst in us.
It seems to me that we need to point out that terrorism is flat out wrong. That this sort of behavior is not acceptable no matter where you may live, for any reason and the people of other countries will not stand for it. Killing innocent men, women, and children to create fear to get you way is not the better way of life. How is it possible that these individuals can see it this way. Gangs on the streets of major cites use a similar tactic while fighting among themselves. To me they are just a step away from being domestic terrorists. But even they can see that it is wrong to kill women and children caught in the middle.
The change, if there is to be one, must be at home. We must teach our children to value life, respect social norms, get back to doing what is right and stop just thinking about ourselves for a change. Maybe we need someone who will encourage this type of change.
Its not a quick fix, but nothing ever worth anything ever is.
Islamic fundamentalists tolerate nothing, and no one. Whatever we do, short of converting, will not satisfy them. Anything else -- they want to kill us.
Wow, great question.
It can simply be wrapped up as an issue of freedom. We allow women to wear halter-tops. In many Islamic country's, that is immoral. They practice terrorism, we do not. On the other hand, we do have a culture focused on loveless sex and violence in the media. Is that moral? Not necessarily, but more importantly than morality is freedom, for without freedom to be immoral, there is no moral fiber.
Moral highground is lost to us. We have too many high up that believe waterboarding is a good idea. We own and operate Gitmo and secret prisons around the world. We are the human rights abusers. Becoming completely secular would help. Especially getting rid of the Crusader type rhetoric that goes around some. The Crusades were a vile and disgusting time in history and the ones that remember best are the islamic fundamentalists. We need to purge from our society people that believe things like the world is 5,000 yrs old, dinosaurs and humans were alive at the same time.
It is my theory that each of us are born with the ability to understand the parameters of morality. Religious philosophical structures have been established,and are utilized by the leaders of these religions for the purpose of defining moral and social behavior approved by the religious tenets of the religion.
Guilt is the tool utilized by every religion to manipulate their congregations. Guilt is created when any of us commit actions which we know are unacceptable or immoral. Rationalization, denial, projection, and ignorance are the primary excuses people use to try to excuse their immoral behavior. Hypocrisy is alive, well, and practiced by most of the members of every religion, from the leadership down to the congregation.
What has happened is we've rewarded people for behaving selfishly and interpreting laws to benefit themselves. This behavior encourages others to follow and now we've become an I/me nation instead of the we/us nation we used to be.
The moral standing of America is not something that can be addressed on the governmental circuit, because our morals are influenced more by our media. When the government has tried to step in, America cried out "Freedom of speech!" and "Freedom of expression!" without realizing that when the constitution was founded, there was the unwritten clause of responsibility. We have our freedoms as long as they are used responsibly.
A critical failure of criticism of America are people who believe everything from Hollywood is a true reflection of American society, then criticise that picture.
Every community has all kinds of churches, mosques, synagogs, etc. with heavy attendance on holy days. Alcohol may not be sold on Sundays. Most of the population believes in some holy book, or respects its teachings.
While western advertising loves to show unclothed women, walk down any street in America, and you can see that men and women are clothed appropriately.
You can't tell that from TV and the Movies.
Money question please?
When I first got a transfer from one site to another in my job, the bosses at my new site said I couldn't work because they had not yet got a payroll number for me. I lost a week of work. Can I claim the wages back, as they wouldn't let me work, it's not like I called in sick or didn't turn up. I turned up twice and they sent me home. I've been there nearly two years and still haven't seen my wages for that week.
Answers:
If you were still working for the same employer before and after then yes. Got to the Citizens Advice Bureau and get some help with this or go to a solicitor and get some advice. They will probably pay you if you speak to them armed with the law and sound like you know what you are talking about. Always do these things by letter as they cannot avoid responding to a letter whereas they can "forget" you spoke to them etc. Even if you speak to them send a letter first and a follow up confirmation letter if necessary. Make sure all communication is recorded by you writing a letter.
If they sent you away, and you were willing to work, then what you should have done is apply for unemployment. They would have paid you for the time, and the company would have ended up paying for that.
Speak to your HR person. Inform them of the situation, and find out what they say. My understanding is that if you are able to work, and it is the company that is "dismissing" you, then they have to pay you for the time. But again, it all depends. Check with HR, or with the state labor department. Maybe even a lawyer that specializes in work-related law.
go see citizen advice bureau if you are in the UK or any other citizen assistance office with legal help
Answers:
If you were still working for the same employer before and after then yes. Got to the Citizens Advice Bureau and get some help with this or go to a solicitor and get some advice. They will probably pay you if you speak to them armed with the law and sound like you know what you are talking about. Always do these things by letter as they cannot avoid responding to a letter whereas they can "forget" you spoke to them etc. Even if you speak to them send a letter first and a follow up confirmation letter if necessary. Make sure all communication is recorded by you writing a letter.
If they sent you away, and you were willing to work, then what you should have done is apply for unemployment. They would have paid you for the time, and the company would have ended up paying for that.
Speak to your HR person. Inform them of the situation, and find out what they say. My understanding is that if you are able to work, and it is the company that is "dismissing" you, then they have to pay you for the time. But again, it all depends. Check with HR, or with the state labor department. Maybe even a lawyer that specializes in work-related law.
go see citizen advice bureau if you are in the UK or any other citizen assistance office with legal help
Money orders?
i am paying someone a money order on ebay and was wondering what do i put under the 'address' line and if i write my address or the person im sending it too or just leave it blank...and do i endorse it on the back?
Answers:
On the front:
Pay to the order of: The person you are sending the money order to.
Purchaser: Your signature
Address: Your address.
Do not sign on the back! That is done by the person that you are sending payment to.
It is your address usually. And you sign just like it was a check.
Answers:
On the front:
Pay to the order of: The person you are sending the money order to.
Purchaser: Your signature
Address: Your address.
Do not sign on the back! That is done by the person that you are sending payment to.
It is your address usually. And you sign just like it was a check.
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Money order question?
i am sending this money order for my friend. it is asking for her signature (purchaser signature). she is out of town and her name is on the account. who should sign? me or her
Answers:
well you cant sign her name because that would be forgery.
I see nothing wrong with you signing it. My hubby buys money orders all the time and I sign them (my name). Nothing is wrong with that. If your friend gave you permission to send it for her then it should be ok for you to sign yor name to it.
The person who you are sending it for; the person getting it has no idea who you are.
You sign it and put her account number on it (if you have a way of getting it) or send a note with it if there is no place for the acct. number. Maybe even contact the company and let them know about it.
Answers:
well you cant sign her name because that would be forgery.
I see nothing wrong with you signing it. My hubby buys money orders all the time and I sign them (my name). Nothing is wrong with that. If your friend gave you permission to send it for her then it should be ok for you to sign yor name to it.
The person who you are sending it for; the person getting it has no idea who you are.
You sign it and put her account number on it (if you have a way of getting it) or send a note with it if there is no place for the acct. number. Maybe even contact the company and let them know about it.
Monday i received a letter of intent to sue me by one of my wholesalers for nonpay.?
Tuesday, i sent a letter of intent to counterclaim for price gouging.
Wednesday, i received a reply letter asking if this matter could be handled out of court and very discreetly.
Thursday, i sent a letter stating no, i wish for this matter to go to court.
Friday i received a settlement offer.
Today, I still wish to take the matter to court.
Your opinion?
And yes, this actually is taking place.
Answers:
First of all, did you know the price of the goods when you purchased them? If so, you are ON THE HOOK for the whole amount! If not, make a counteroffer to the offer of settlement and SETTLE. You owe them something, you cannot have the goods for nothing, you cannot benefit from a contract without some sort of payment. And believe me, there's a contract here, whether it's in writing or not. Settle babe, SETTLE.
Ok, now that I see your further details, that price increase was OUTRAGEOUS and illegal, and you were blindsided, suckerpunched by these pieces of work who pulled this crap. I still don't understand why the price wasn't fixed before the transaction was made. In any event, you guys seem to have what is called a "course of business" and they have to stick to it, they have deviated way too far from the course. You should countersue, and sue for punitive damages. Also, sue for costs, in other words, they must pay your legal fees as the result of forcing you into bringing a lawyer into it. Infuriating. Good luck.
Sounds like they were trying to 'legally' blackmail you and you called their bluff. LoL! Good for you!!
I say if the settlement is decent go for it, don't waste the courts time. Unless the gouging was outrageous then other people need to know about it, because they may be other victims as well.
You should first determine if "price gouging" gives rise to a civil suit. Ordinarily, people are free to negotiate whatever price the parties agree to.
screw em and the horse they rode in on!
I hope you contacted the State Attorney's office also.
I'd take the settlement under the condition that they can still be charged criminally.
If you think you can prevail with a better outcome in court you should go for it.
Wednesday, i received a reply letter asking if this matter could be handled out of court and very discreetly.
Thursday, i sent a letter stating no, i wish for this matter to go to court.
Friday i received a settlement offer.
Today, I still wish to take the matter to court.
Your opinion?
And yes, this actually is taking place.
Answers:
First of all, did you know the price of the goods when you purchased them? If so, you are ON THE HOOK for the whole amount! If not, make a counteroffer to the offer of settlement and SETTLE. You owe them something, you cannot have the goods for nothing, you cannot benefit from a contract without some sort of payment. And believe me, there's a contract here, whether it's in writing or not. Settle babe, SETTLE.
Ok, now that I see your further details, that price increase was OUTRAGEOUS and illegal, and you were blindsided, suckerpunched by these pieces of work who pulled this crap. I still don't understand why the price wasn't fixed before the transaction was made. In any event, you guys seem to have what is called a "course of business" and they have to stick to it, they have deviated way too far from the course. You should countersue, and sue for punitive damages. Also, sue for costs, in other words, they must pay your legal fees as the result of forcing you into bringing a lawyer into it. Infuriating. Good luck.
Sounds like they were trying to 'legally' blackmail you and you called their bluff. LoL! Good for you!!
I say if the settlement is decent go for it, don't waste the courts time. Unless the gouging was outrageous then other people need to know about it, because they may be other victims as well.
You should first determine if "price gouging" gives rise to a civil suit. Ordinarily, people are free to negotiate whatever price the parties agree to.
screw em and the horse they rode in on!
I hope you contacted the State Attorney's office also.
I'd take the settlement under the condition that they can still be charged criminally.
If you think you can prevail with a better outcome in court you should go for it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)